The agreement is the result of the two countries` determination to “end the conflict and confrontation that have so far weighed on their relations.” He designed the steps to be taken to further normalize mutual relations and also defined the principles that should govern their future relations.    The Delhi Agreement on The Return of War and Civilian Internees is a tripartite agreement between these states, signed on 28 August 1973. The agreement was signed by Kamal Hossain, the Foreign Minister of the Government of Bangladesh, Sardar Swaran Singh, the Indian Minister of Foreign Affairs and Aziz Ahmed, Minister of State for Defence and Foreign Affairs of the Pakistani government.    (iii) Withdrawals begin with demenin and end within 30 days.  What the Simla agreement did not achieve for India could have been achieved by the Delhi Agreement signed in 1973 by India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. The agreement did not prevent relations between the two countries from deteriorating until the armed conflict, the last time during the 1999 Kargil war. In Operation Meghdoot of 1984, India seized the entire inhospitable region of the Siachens Glacier, where the border was clearly not defined in the agreement (perhaps because the area was considered too arid to be controversial); This was considered by Pakistan to be a violation of the Simla agreement. Most of the subsequent deaths in the Siachen conflict were caused by natural disasters. B, like the avalanches of 2010, 2012 and 2016. The Simla agreement reads as a communiqué rather than a peace agreement with a country that had waged war on India.
Nothing in the agreement has put Pakistan in a state of good behaviour in the future. It also contained some ridiculous expectations, such as the clause that required both governments to “take all measures within their power to prevent hostile propaganda against each other.” Gandhi said: “As far as prisoners of war are concerned, first there is our own difficulty, what we feel about a lasting peace. Second, there is the attitude of Bangladesh. …” She continued: “Our Minister of Foreign Affairs has been invited by our people to ask for more land, a corridor, repairs, etc. There is a tremendous sense in our political circles on these issues. We keep them as a price of peace. I do not know what the reactions would be in our Parliament. There is a very important feeling that Kashmir should play a role in our agreement. This agreement is ratified by both countries in accordance with their respective constitutional procedures and enters into force from the date of exchange of ratification instruments.  Bhutto said: “You have done great things for your country. It would be insatiable for your people to ask you for more. He insisted: “As far as the Kashmir dispute is concerned, an agreement will be reached in the near future. It`s going to become a colony. Let people come and go.
We should not argue about that. Bhutto began: “Whatever our fears, we can discuss and resolve them if we can. To begin the process of achieving lasting peace, the two governments agree: the final effective agreement states that “both countries are committed to resolving their differences through peaceful means through bilateral negotiations or other peaceful means agreed upon among themselves.” This is the reason why the United Nations did give rise to a fixed funeral to settle disputes between the two countries.